Startup NetworxMountain West
DirectoryPeoplePatentsClinical TrialsRFPs & GrantsAnalysisSignal
Sign In
Startup Networx

A commons for deep tech in the Mountain West. Built and maintained by the community it serves. Open data, CC-BY.

© 2026 Startup Networx
Discover
DirectoryOpen RFPsEvents
Community
NewsResourcesDashboard
Contribute
Add an orgSuggest an editClaim an org
About
Embed widgetsModerationPrivacySign in
← News
News

Achieving Asymptotic Near-Optimality Without $\delta$-Similarity

Sampling-based motion planning algorithms are a popular class of trajectory planning algorithm due to their speed in complex, high-dimensional environments and ability to handle kinodynamic constraints, specifically through the use of forward dynamics

Read on arxiv.orgvia RSS

From the feed

Sampling-based motion planning algorithms are a popular class of trajectory planning algorithm due to their speed in complex, high-dimensional environments and ability to handle kinodynamic constraints, specifically through the use of forward dynamics propagation. Many such planners claim to achieve asymptotic near-optimality by proving the almost sure sampling of trajectories that are close to an optimal trajectory in the state space, known as \delta-similar trajectories. This paper shows that the proof behind asymptotic \delta-similarity relies on an unstated assumption that \delta-similar trajectory segments will always be kept once sampled. This assumption does not hold in general. A problematic case, referred to as ``crowding out,'' is described, where locally low-cost paths prevent trajectories that are \delta-similar to the optimal trajectory from being added to the tree. It is shown, however, that asymptotic near-optimality guarantees can still be achieved without guarantees of \delta-similar solution trajectories when crowding out is properly accounted for. An example environment and system are provided where crowding out is shown to occur, demonstrating a scenario where inductively sampling a \delta-similar solution trajectory is impossible.

Continue reading on arxiv.org