Teleoperated demonstrations are often multimodal even when the underlying dynamics are nearly deterministic given the executed action. We argue that this multimodality typically mixes three factors–operator habit in action selection, shared physics,
Teleoperated demonstrations are often multimodal even when the underlying dynamics are nearly deterministic given the executed action. We argue that this multimodality typically mixes three factors–operator habit in action selection, shared physics, and observation nuisance–and that entangled next-observation predictors absorb all three. We formalize the split with a structural causal model a=g(h,z,u), z'=f(z,a), o=r(z,c), and test it with complementary interventions: replacing or shuffling actions at fixed state sharply increases next-state error, whereas appearance and camera changes should not; habit-aware reverse scoring improves ranking of feasible pasts without rewriting the dynamics. The associated adaptation rule is to freeze a shared physics readout and update only a thin interface. On StackCube, DROID, and RH20T this rule improves low-shot transfer relative to training from scratch, retains cleaner dynamics under corrupted adaptation data, and extends from proprioception to pixel observations with multi-view and multi-step checks. We do not equate latent actions with operator habit, and we do not target large-scale video generation benchmarks.