With quantum sensors, simulators and networks emerging, a future of quantum technology may produce quantum states as data—that is, coherently rather than as classical measurement records—thus motivating the study of suitable quantum generalisation
With quantum sensors, simulators and networks emerging, a future of quantum technology may produce quantum states as data—that is, coherently rather than as classical measurement records—thus motivating the study of suitable quantum generalisations of modern machine learning, including the automated, unsupervised extraction of useful representations. Two ingredients are central to the latter: inference, mapping observations to latent representations, and generation, mapping latent states back to synthetic data. Both are related to each other and to joint distributions for training models by the chain-rule of classical probability theory. The fact that quantum states however lack such universal, standard factorisation property thus poses a challenge. Here we develop a conceptual and mathematical framework for unsupervised representation learning from quantum data. Models are joint quantum states over visible and latent systems; state-over-time maps provide a notion of factorisation into a marginal state and inference (generation) channel; models with inference (generation) are ambiguous states—states for which such factorisation obtains—subject to a further consistency condition on extended inference maps as data extension. These stipulations are restrictive: we show that non-trivial models must feature non-linear such maps to the extended space. For three representative state-over-time maps, we completely characterise the ambiguous states, uncovering a hierarchy tied to the positive-partial-transpose (PPT) criterion from entanglement theory. Notably, the Leifer-Spekkens construction supports inference and generation exactly for model classes of PPT states, thus allowing genuinely quantum visible-latent correlations. We also formulate quantum counterparts of exact and approximate inference training, explore weaker notions of data extension and sketch a future research programme.